LSC uses faster server-side caching and does an excellent job addressing core web vitals. LiteSpeed is not only faster than Apache/NGINX, but this also means you can use the free LiteSpeed Cache plugin + QUIC.cloud CDN which is arguably the fastest/cheapest setup right now. LiteSpeed – A2’s lower 2 plans use Apache while the higher 2 plans use LiteSpeed servers. The comparison page shows how higher plans use faster technology: While it’s common for hosts to use better servers and NVMe storage on higher plans, I’m not sure why A2 Hosting doesn’t use LiteSpeed servers on all their plans while most other hosts do. A2 even has a page showcasing their LiteSpeed hosting plans. You have to use at least the Turbo Boost plan to get these. ![]() LiteSpeed + NVMe AMD EPYC Servers On Higher Plans Only Strictly referring to CPU cores + RAM, NameHero and ChemiCloud are a better value.Ģ. Some people think Hostinger is cheap, but it’s only because you’re paying $1-2 less on each plan for roughly half the CPU/RAM. On average, you pay more on A2 than NameHero/ChemiCloud. When you add the price of all their WordPress hosting plans together, then divide by the total number of CPU cores/RAM, you get the average cost of 1 CPU core + 1GB RAM. There are missing bars because A2 doesn’t use LiteSpeed on their lower 2 plans, and ChemiCloud only offers 3 WordPress hosting plans. When you put it together, this is the chart you get. A2 Hosting comparison page NameHero comparison page ChemiCloud comparison page Hostinger comparison page Many complaints about support on TrustPilotĮach of these hosts has a “specs page” where you can see the number of CPU cores + RAM you’re getting on each plan (among other things like whether a plan uses LiteSpeed, NVMe, etc).LiteSpeed + NVMe AMD EPYC servers on higher plans only.Otherwise, I would use NameHero if your visitors are from US or EU, Scala Hosting or ChemiCloud (which both use LiteSpeed and have 4.9+ star TrustPilot ratings). The only reason I’d use A2 Hosting is if you need to use their Asian data center. We signed up for 3 years to get the best price, but there’s no way we’re paying $21/month for any shared hosting – and you shouldn’t either. I also kept the ransomware attack in mind which happened to A2 in 2019 and I didn’t want to experience anything like that either.įinally, renewal rates are almost 3x intro prices. ![]() Second, A2’s uptimes aren’t great and their network status page has alarmingly frequent interruptions. If you pull up A2’s spec page and compare it to NameHero’s, you’ll see what I mean. I could spend $1/month more and get pretty much the same plan on NameHero only we’re getting 3 CPU + 3GB RAM instead of 2 CPU + 3GB RAM on A2. A2 Hosting is “OK” but there are better options.Īfter hosting my ex’s restaurant website with them, we moved to NameHero for a few reasons.įirst off, a main benefit of A2 Hosting is LiteSpeed and AMD EPYC servers, but you have to use their Turbo Boost plan for $7/month to get these.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |